Showing posts with label agnes varda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label agnes varda. Show all posts

June 17, 2008

Vagabond (1985)

2/5

Agnès Varda's Vagabond is a faux-documentary narrative of a young female drifter found dead in a ditch one winter in France. Through flashbacks of those who interacted with her before her death, we get an incredibly rich history of her last few months of life. It very much reminded me of Into the Wild; as in that movie, I simply couldn't relate to the character in any way, shape, or form. I couldn't wrap my mind around their dependence on the kindness of strangers. It did bring up some interesting thematic questions, including her near-constant association with domesticated animals and her on-again, off-again desire to be alone or with others.

The documentary "talking to the camera" style was often at odds with the narrative storytelling structure. Nevertheless, it made for a unique and rare feel. And the content. Well, it could pique your interest, but never keep it. The thing that really struck me was how connected all the side characters were. Sometimes that gave it a very "written" feel, but at the same time it felt true to life. The cinematography also had its little quirks (panning/tracking would continue past the action, making it feel slow). Most of the acting I hated, because the actors (much like the film itself) didn't know whether it was supposed to be a documentary or a realist narrative. The music was way too melodramatic, like the score for a mystery horror film. And it felt way too long for being only 105 minutes. All in all, it isn't compelling enough to recommend. Pass on it.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089960/

April 28, 2007

Les Glaneurs et la glaneuse (2000)

3/5

Agnès Varda, the biggest female director of the French New Wave, continues to make movies that still have the feel of French New Wave in them. It was clearly low-budget and exceedingly self-referential, and lacked a traditional story arc. The movie is a free-form documentary about gleaners. Yes, the topic is a bit unconventional and is perhaps one of the film's biggest detractors. After all, what do I care about gleaners? But it has some extremely insightful relationships to lots of different things. The movie has no central objective or goal; it is exploratory in nature. That makes it extremely interesting and surprising, but also hinders it. I felt there was a lot of repetition, and despite its 80-minute running time, the movie feels like it takes forever because of the lack of organization. However, there are some very nice compositions and provocative ideas sprinkled randomly throughout the movie. Bottom line: interesting, but why am I watching this? For an excellent free-form documentary that is much more inventive, creative, and fun, I wholeheartedly recommend Orson Welles's F for Fake.

IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0247380/