Sin City: A Dame To Kill For (2014)

2/5

Sin City: A Dame To Kill For is the most recent in a seemingly endless spate of uninspired summer sequels that do little more than attempt to rehash a winning franchise/formula and only end up disappointing everybody. It brings back some actors but not others (I was really hoping for a Clive Owen cameo, but it never came) and jumbles up the timeline in the most unnecessarily labyrinthine way. A lot of it just didn't make sense if you spent more than a few seconds thinking about the plot. The one saving grace is the pure villainy of the film's title character; she is a femme fatale for the ages.

A Dame To Kill For looks exactly the same as the original without feeling as inventive or awe-inspiring. While the first one was fresh and gritty, this one is tired and gruesome. The special effects and the writing both go way overboard in an attempt to one-up itself and raise the bar on violent deaths even more extravagantly. It's all a little too much--honestly even a little sickening--and we've seen it before. I loved the first one and saw it three times the first week it came out in theaters, but I have no desire to watch this one ever again.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458481/

Jarhead (2005)

4.9/5

Sam Mendes's Jarhead adapts Anthony Swofford's memoirs of his time in the Marines during the Gulf War. Yet it isn't really a war movie; it transcends simple genre descriptions. It constantly transforms itself from sharp humor to brutal violence, from the boredom of waiting to the tension of war, from the whitest sands to the reddest fires. These transitions are fluid, organic--a microcosm of how our lives and emotions are tossed around by events beyond our control. It is a film that must be felt to be truly appreciated.

This movie stands apart from others on its technical merits. The acting is realistic, the editing precise, special effects seamless. The cinematography by long-time Coens-collaborator Roger Deakins is constantly breathtaking--he manages to make the desert mesmerizing. The gritty, ultracontrasty look, combined with the hand-held camerawork, gave the movie a sense of realism. The musical choices and placement elevated it into evocative poetry though, which made the movie a much fuller experience. Another reason I love this movie is because it shows the director's evolution and expansion to take full advantage of the medium of film. His first movie after directing plays was American Beauty, and since then he has moved to more and more cinematic movies like Road to Perdition and now Jarhead.

While rewatching it, I noticed some parts I forgot were there, points in time that seemed less necessary, scenes that were looser and floppier. The editing wasn't as tight as I remembered. Other than that, though, I can think of no major points against this movie. It is beautiful, powerful, and meaningful. Do not pass this up.

IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0418763/

Breach (2007)

4/5

Breach is a startlingly terrifying character study of Russian spy Robert Hanssen. The genius behind this movie is the subtlety with which his hidden layers are revealed; it isn't until the end of the film that you realize what kind of a monster this man is. And wow, the final shot is ridiculously powerful--an incredible ending to an incredible movie.

Chris Cooper's acting was spectacular, on par with his performance in American Beauty. Laura Linney was also fantastic, aided by an excellent script that had witty dialogue at times and powerful emotions at others. The directing and editing were also good, surprisingly so. The rather hackneyed and trite montage where they reveal Hanssen's betrayals was pulled off with ease and had an astoundingly powerful effect on me. It was as if I were in Eric O'Neill's place, learning of all of this for the first time and being shocked into submission by the flood of information of someone I used to respect.

Ryan Phillippe's acting was not great, but not bad either. A better choice might have been Hayden Christensen. The cinematography and music did nothing more than merely get the job done--they didn't stand out in any way. Also, there might be some differences of expectations about this movie. One thing that might turn people off to this movie is that the reasons for Hanssen's espionage are never really investigated in depth, although the movie never promises or suggests that it will do such a thing. There wasn't much in the way of action. In fact, the movie was quite chatty (but I love good dialogue). In the end though, none of these negatives really bother me at all--this is a great movie and highly recommended.

IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0401997/