Showing posts with label marcello mastroianni. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marcello mastroianni. Show all posts

August 04, 2009

La Dolce Vita (1960)

4/5

Federico Fellini's La Dolce Vita, The Sweet Life in English, tells the story of journalist Marcello (Mastroianni) and the wild, extravagant bacchanalias he shares with international actresses and other wealthy women. The movie is adept at showing the striking disconnect between how the celebrities appear and how they truly are. Through Marcello's eyes, we see the excessive, endless parties lasting well past sunrise that inevitably result in his unconsummated lust. We see their paparazzi-bloated image twist his mind into thinking he's experienced unrequited love; only on the following day do we see what kind of lives they actually lead. We realize we really have no idea who these people are, and neither did Marcello, which only causes him to drown his sorrows in more drinking. In part a condemnation of sensationalist media (Fellini actually coined the term paparazzi in this movie), in part an exposé on the lifestyles of the rich and the famous, this film is astute and meaningful, absorbing and immersing, and above all aesthetically mesmerizing.

La Dolce Vita is visually intoxicating from start to end. Something about the cinematography, the movement of the camera, the movement of the characters, makes the whole film seem so alive. The film itself dances to Nino Rota's score. That is not to say that the 2 hour, 45 minute film is without flaw. It takes a while to make its message known; it seems to espouse the vapid lifestyles at first and only at the end are we meant to realize their inadequacies. It has its fair share of boring parts. In fact, the parties themselves turn boring quite quickly--an intended effect, I presume--and the parties form the bulk of the film. Also, it was sometimes confusing trying to orient yourselves to time, place, and person because of the repetitive nights Marcello spends wandering the streets of Rome. Still, La Dolce Vita is well worth watching and well worth remembering.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053779/

July 22, 2009

La Notte (1961)

2/5

Michelangelo Antonioni's La Notte is the quintessential art film that modern audiences love to hate for its lack of entertainment value, its inability to keep the viewers' attention, and its ineffable "meaning." The barebones plot follows a married couple (Mastoianni and Moreau) as they discover that they've fallen out of love after a party where they each become involved with someone else. It is the second film in an informal trilogy on the inability of couples and lovers to communicate with each other. And yet there is nothing but silence and banal dialogue nobody cares about, not even the characters. The silence isn't interesting or exciting either--it's just boring. There are inexplicable scenes, there are stilted performances, and there are about 110 minutes that could have been cut out of the 120 minute runtime.

The movie was, in fact, so boring that we took 10 minute breaks and missed nothing. On those breaks, we read cell phone reviews, did crosswords, and caught M&M's in our mouths. (In case you're curious, I caught 17 out of 20 self-thrown M&M's and also caught M&M's thrown from about 15 feet away. Do you see how this is already more fascinating than the content of the movie?) The reason this isn't a one-star movie, which it was very close to being, is that it actually had some pretty interesting thematic threads. Other than that, nothing really stands out about this movie in a positive way. If you're looking for a good Antonioni movie to see, check out Blow-Up. Forget about this one.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054130/