Holiday Affair (1949)

3/5

Holiday Affair is a sentimental Hollywood holiday story with enough cute kids and Christmas cheer to pull at your heartstrings and make you swoon. Janet Leigh plays an indiscreet "comparison shopper" who gets caught by a kind and generous salesman named Steve (Mitchum) when she tries to return a toy train set the day after she buys it. Instead of turning her in, Steve gives her a pass and ends up getting fired. He quickly falls in love with her and her young son (Gebert), but soon discovers that she's already engaged to a perfectly adequate lawyer named Carl (Corey) with plans to get married several days later on New Year's.

The movie is fairly straightforward with a very simple premise: how will these two lovebirds end up together? But it challenges us to find a solution to the love triangle and it somehow surprises us with the only solution possible. It seems to hurdle toward an impossibility, but deftly twists around the curve at a steady pace. Just thinking about it makes me smile even now. It's not the best shot, the best edited, or the best acted movie of its day. Not even close. But its story has charm and its actors have electricity. And while it's an enjoyable enough holiday movie, I'm not sure it's good enough to make the yearly Christmas roster.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0041473/

Dead Man (1995)

1/5

Jim Jarmusch's Dead Man is one of the most uninteresting, meandering, meaningless movies I've seen since Truffaut's The Soft Skin. I sat there for two hours watching scenes transition to different scenes with the barest semblance of plot or purpose. The movie follows William Blake (Depp) as he makes his way from Cleveland to the West in the late 19th century. He gets mixed up in violence and must go on the run to save his life, but I think the title is meant to insinuate that he is already dead. People who like the movie will tell you it's about a man's transformation in the time of our country's transformation, but I think those people are just seeing stuff that isn't there. Or, perhaps, seeing the bits and pieces of stuff beneath all the garbage piled on top of it.

Johnny Depp kind of reminded me of Guy Pearce in this movie, and I mean that in a bad way. He has dead expressions and no depth. He sounds entirely uninterested in just about everything going on, even when he's supposed to be scared or excited. Regardless of whether his affect is intentional or not, it's simply boring and painful to watch. I don't even want to talk about the dialogue, because I'll just get upset. The script tries to be edgy and badass, but instead it's spoken by what sounds like bad student actors trying to be edgy and badass. Mix this bad acting (or bad directing, I'm honestly not sure which it is) with crappy special effects and cheesy old-time film techniques and you have an entirely laughable production. It's times like these I wish I had waited before burning an entire director's oeuvre until I knew I liked them.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112817/

The Yakuza (1975)

4/5

The Yakuza is a well-crafted story finely-tuned to the silver screen. Written by Paul Schrader (Taxi Driver) and Robert Towne (Chinatown), the movie continually sucks you in. Deeper and deeper into its vision of cruel blackness and vengeful hatred. What starts off as a (relatively uninteresting) story of a WWII veteran (Robert Mitchum) who returns to Japan to retrieve his friend's kidnapped daughter turns into a fascinatingly complex study of honor and duty. With a terrifyingly tense climax. While some have said that the movie is about Japan, I see relatively little about Japan as a country. It is a gangster film at its core, and a great one at that.

The story, the characters, and the themes it presents are some of the best aspects of this movie. Sydney Pollack's directing is also great, with phenomenal music and excellent cinematography, shot compositions, and camera movement. Casting and acting were also spot-on. The performances were realistic and subtle, electing to remain in the background of the incredible story instead of stealing the spotlight. While I disagreed with some of the editing choices, there were very few technical flaws in this movie. (On a side note, I did find it difficult to understand some of the thicker accents, but it wasn't too disorienting.) If you like gangster movies, I highly recommend this movie. (And if you have Netflix, you can watch it for free online, like I did. Unless you have a Mac, that is.)

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073918/

El Dorado (1966)

4/5

Howard Hawks's El Dorado is a loose remake of his earlier, better Rio Bravo (read my review here). The story isn't as interesting, the characters aren't as rich, and the comedy is nearly absent. Much is the same, but a little bit cheesier. Both films have lackluster cinematography. The pacing is fluid and the story is solid, even if they lack innovation and novelty. What El Dorado does have over Rio Bravo is better actors and more exciting action. All in all, it's an entertaining story told effectively. If you're looking for a fun western, check this out. If you're looking for a great western, check out Rio Bravo.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061619/