RocknRolla (2008)

4/5

Guy Ritchie's RocknRolla is pretty much the same movie as all of Guy Ritchie's other gangster movies. The complicated and confusing plot is made more imperceptible by thick, obfuscatory British accents. And while it started out with a story that seemed uninteresting and unengrossing, there was just enough innovation and cleverness to make it fresh and new. The cinematography, style, and editing all feel the same as his earlier movies (which is a compliment). The decidedly quick-witted humor is also back, and in full force. Guy Ritchie knows British movies, British actors, and British sensbilities, but not American ones. Jeremy Piven and Ludacris felt a little out of place here. Still, RocknRolla is an altogether enjoyable film that is on par with Snatch. I recommend it to anyone who knows and enjoys Guy Ritchie.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1032755/

Milk (2008)

4/5

Gus Van Sant's Milk tells the incredibly powerful true story of Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man elected to major public office in San Francisco during the 70's. With flawless editing and pacing, Van Sant seamlessly integrates new footage with historical footage to fully engulf you in the feel and mood of the times. The acting is tender, honest, and subdued, fitting in perfectly with the documentary realism of the film. The portrayal of the homosexual community is equally sympathetic and genuine--and enlightening and moving to all who are not members of the community. Thanks to the eloquent writing, I could feel their pain, their struggle, and their elation at every small step towards equality.

Milk is more than a simple movie; it is a cry for help and an argument for social justice. But by entrenching itself so firmly in a specific time and place, and for a specific cause, it loses a bit of its universal appeal. Harvey Milk constantly emphasized that his movement was for homosexuals, not civil rights as a whole. Regardless, gay rights will undoubtedly remain a relevant issue for most of the rest of my life. And for that, I am grateful that I saw this movie. I'm not sure of its replay value, but I highly recommend you see Milk if you haven't already.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1013753/

Blindness (2008)

4/5

Blindness, directed by City of God's Fernando Meirelles, is a frightening, eye-opening film. In an unnamed, English-speaking city, an epidemic of blindness breaks out and the government begins to quarantine those infected. One woman (Julianne Moore) is still able to see, and helps her husband (Mark Ruffalo) govern Ward 1 of the quarantine facility with fairness and equality. A gangster (Gael García Bernal) uses his gun and threats of violence to take over Ward 3 and eventually the entire facility. He controls the food rations and requires other wards to pay him in jewelry; once that runs out, women. And from this basic, unsettling premise, we see the terrifying lengths men and women will go to when pitted against each other in a place without rules. What hope does good have at winning, or even surviving, against evil? Much like I Stand Alone, the movie is a bleak reminder of humanity at its most hopeless.

Technically, much of the movie was excellent. I loved the cinematography and its special effects, which simultaneously gave the film a gritty, raw realism and an evocative feel and mood. The music was memorable and brilliant, but felt out of place at times (it seemed a bit too playful). The editing was usually on-point but could sometimes be slow or poorly-timed. The characters were a bit bland, but the acting was more than adequate and altogether impressive. While movies like this are effective at what they set out to do, they are unpleasant and difficult to watch. Still, I felt moved by it and recommend it to those interested.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0861689/

Frost/Nixon (2008)

3/5

Ron Howard's Frost/Nixon is better than most of Ron Howard's recent movies (Cinderella Man, The Da Vinci Code), but it's still a Ron Howard movie, which means it's still not great. The movie overdramatizes a series of long-winded and forgettable interviews between British talk show host David Frost (Sheen) and former president Richard Nixon (Langella) surrounding Watergate. There's a lot of build-up without a satisfying climax or conclusion (it takes about 100 minutes before the unfulfilling, deflated admission of guilt). Interspersed throughout the film are a number of fake interviews with the characters at some unknown time looking back on the Frost/Nixon interviews and how they affected them; maybe it would have been better if they were interviews with the actual people instead of the actors. The sole purpose of their inclusion seemed to be to explain what was going on emotionally and cerebrally instead of leaving it up to the viewer to understand by themselves.

The best part of the movie was the characterization and acting. I was surprised by how well-rounded, human, and fair Howard allowed his characters. The actors did more than their fair share, fully infusing their characters with nuance, tragedy, and comedy. The cinematography was also crisp and sharp, although at times a bit overwrought. If only the writing and pacing were better, this might have been a much better movie on the whole. Still, though, I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone who isn't already intrigued by the relevant events.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870111/

Taken (2009)

3/5

Taken was sold to me as Bourne--but middle-aged. And it was sold accurately. The little plot there is (co-written by Luc Besson) follows an ex-CIA agent (Liam Neeson) racing to find his kidnapped daughter (Maggie Grace) in Paris. The first 30 minutes of the film actually give the movie a strong dramatic foothold, which helps us empathize with the father and his situation (albeit in a manner that is both overly melodramatic and unabashedly stereotypically extreme). It provides an unexpectedly long but satisfactory framework for the next 60 minutes, where the father kills everyone everywhere in every way imaginable. I suppose it is written, acted, and shot in a realistic manner, but the final product is just too ludicrous to be seen as such.

Speaking of which, the movie is extremely well-made: action-packed and adrenaline-filled, slick and cool. The cinematography is crisp, the fight scenes thrilling, the pacing tense. And while I trash-talk the plot, the all-too-real sex trafficking terrors it brings up are worth thinking about and fighting against. All in all, Taken is a solid piece of entertainment and I do not regret spending $0 on my free ticket. Anyone who loved Bourne is going to love this, so go out and enjoy.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0936501/