Showing posts with label alan tudyk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alan tudyk. Show all posts
December 30, 2014
Big Hero 6 (2014)
4/5
Big Hero 6 is a wonderfully enjoyable animated film by Disney. Much of the film centers around the relationship between Hiro (Potter), a young technophile and "bot fighter," and his older brother Tadachi (Henney), an engineering student at a futuristic tech institute. Tadachi has created a health-focused robot called Baymax (Adsit), but Hiro is less than impressed at the huggable marshmallow of a machine. After a catastrophe at the institute's tech fair, Hiro must join up with a band of misfit superheroes to protect the city from a nefarious villain.
The same production company behind Frozen makes essentially its action-oriented counterpart, focusing on brotherly love in the context of a superhero world instead of a princess fairytale. It features similar themes and predictable plot points, but the repetition surprisingly does nothing to take away from the overall experience. Disney films are never really about shocking audiences with plot twists but about wowing them with stellar storytelling and magical details. Big Hero 6 delights--it's adorable, exciting, and fun--and is another big win for Disney.
IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2245084/
January 09, 2014
Frozen (2013)
3/5
Disney's Frozen is a commercially-successful princess movie chock-full of uplifting songs and adorable animation. And while it has its charms, it just didn't satisfy any of my expectations. For me, it's fairly middle of the road. I have a lot of issues with it--first and foremost being that a lot of it simply doesn't make sense--so I'll go on a short rant before I come to my conclusion.
- The relationship between the sisters feels inauthentic. As if the mere fact that they are sisters is enough that they display unconditional love for each other. Maybe that's how Disney stories have always been and I haven't been paying attention, but it just didn't feel real for me.
- Why are there trolls? Why do they possess certain magical properties and not others? What purpose do they serve? And, most importantly, what makes them "love experts"?
- Why is Olaf the snowman so absurd? He is not merely comic relief; he is the epitome of non sequitur. How and why does he exist at all? Even visually, he seems out of place in the film. In terms of mood, he's even more nonsensical.
- I find myself opposed to the morals of the film's conclusion. The suspicious character, who does not seem particularly bad, is imprisoned. The truly evil murderous villain, on the other hand, is simply sent back home for his family to punish. Is that really the message we want children to get out of this movie?
- The songs feel more like Broadway songs than Disney songs. They're extremely dynamic with a full sound and mature voice behind them. They're fantastic songs, but they don't fit comfortably within the Disney canon.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that the movie is perfectly adequate but not particularly special. It will entertain and it will delight, but it feels so haphazardly constructed that I cannot imagine it will stand the test of time. It's fine. Most people will like it. But it's ultimately a distraction; it is not Disney's reclamation of success.
IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2294629/
May 27, 2013
Wreck-It Ralph (2012)
4/5
Disney's Wreck-It Ralph was a surprisingly entertaining movie. The story follows Wreck-It Ralph (Reilly), the bad guy in a video game named after its hero, Fix-It Felix (McBrayer). Disgruntled and tired of being the villain, going home to a bed of bricks, he goes on a quest to win a medal in the hopes of being liked. He accidentally finds himself in a candy-coated racing game called Sugar Rush, where he meets a "glitch" named Vanellope (Silverman), who wants nothing more than to race in the big leagues. But she needs his medal to enter the race.
Now that we have all that plot out of the way, let's get to the good stuff. The movie is charming and sweet, but not too saccharine that it hurts. Although the movie is predictable in many ways, it still manages to surprise and delight along the way, thanks to its bevy of side characters and inventive plotting. And all the video game references are just icing on the cake, filling the movie with multiple aha! moments that leave you with a smile on your face. I honestly have nothing really bad to say about this movie. It's a fun way to spend an afternoon reminiscing about all those afternoons you spent playing video games as a kid. Highly recommended.
IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1772341/
July 04, 2011
Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)
3/5
Transformers: Dark of the Moon is a movie that is missing a lot, most notably the word "Side" in the title. It is also missing believable characters and believable dialogue. It tries to make up for it with sexy girls and 3D special effects, and it does a surprisingly good job of doing just that. The plot is, like the first two, about humans and Autobots against Decepticons, except this time it takes place in DC and Chicago. And that is the only reason I saw this movie. The Chicago scenes are amazing. It was like Source Code but reversed: I loved seeing all the buildings I was familiar with get attacked, burning to the ground with smoke wafting out the side. (I have no idea why that brings me joy.)
As for the rest of the movie, it plays like the prior two with only a modicum of improvements while retaining its numerous problems. It was still difficult to follow the robot characters and what exactly was going on in between things being blown up. The action sequences are fairly minimal and don't really keep the tension up. There is no climax and no final battle to speak of. Michael Bay tries to pull a little Forrest Gump CGI magic involving old footage of presidents, only it feels way too strained and unnatural. I thought the first half was a lot better than the second half, even though the second half has the bonus of being set in Chicago. Another positive is that the movie is hilarious, with stand-out performances by Ken Jeong, Alan Tudyk, and John Turturro. Overall, an enjoyable popcorn flick that will delight all the Chicagoans who got to see it being filmed here last year. And to everyone else: if you've seen the other two, you know exactly what you're getting into with this one.
IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1399103/
Transformers: Dark of the Moon is a movie that is missing a lot, most notably the word "Side" in the title. It is also missing believable characters and believable dialogue. It tries to make up for it with sexy girls and 3D special effects, and it does a surprisingly good job of doing just that. The plot is, like the first two, about humans and Autobots against Decepticons, except this time it takes place in DC and Chicago. And that is the only reason I saw this movie. The Chicago scenes are amazing. It was like Source Code but reversed: I loved seeing all the buildings I was familiar with get attacked, burning to the ground with smoke wafting out the side. (I have no idea why that brings me joy.)
As for the rest of the movie, it plays like the prior two with only a modicum of improvements while retaining its numerous problems. It was still difficult to follow the robot characters and what exactly was going on in between things being blown up. The action sequences are fairly minimal and don't really keep the tension up. There is no climax and no final battle to speak of. Michael Bay tries to pull a little Forrest Gump CGI magic involving old footage of presidents, only it feels way too strained and unnatural. I thought the first half was a lot better than the second half, even though the second half has the bonus of being set in Chicago. Another positive is that the movie is hilarious, with stand-out performances by Ken Jeong, Alan Tudyk, and John Turturro. Overall, an enjoyable popcorn flick that will delight all the Chicagoans who got to see it being filmed here last year. And to everyone else: if you've seen the other two, you know exactly what you're getting into with this one.
IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1399103/
September 16, 2007
3:10 to Yuma (2007)
4/5
3:10 to Yuma is one of the most interesting westerns to come out since Unforgiven. It follows the story of rancher Dan Evans (Christian Bale) as he escorts the notorious outlaw Ben Wade (Russell Crowe) to a prison train, the 3:10 to Yuma. The cast was well-picked and the acting by Crowe and Bale was nearly flawless (and I traditionally do not appreciate their acting). The storyline entranced me from beginning to end. I kept trying to figure out what would happen and kept finding myself unexpectedly surprised. I loved how nearly every character got introduced and eliminated in measured amounts--very fitting of the genre. The character evolution of everyone except Ben Wade was mesmerizing. The landscapes were beautifully shot, the editing perfectly well-paced. And 3:10 to Yuma has an absolutely amazing score.
I really disliked the character of Ben Wade. Everyone else was really interesting and fascinating, but Ben Wade was just disappointing. I got really excited as the film progressed, because it seemed as if he was actually getting more and more evil. What most movies that try to humanize bad guys do is show his evil side first and then his human side at the end. This movie started out by flipping that, slowly increasing his brutality as time went on, but in the end it flipped back to his sympathetic side. Didn't really like that. Also, it kind of went crazy at the end and I didn't buy the shift in Wade's character. It felt like he did stuff out of character to fit the plot. How disappointing in an otherwise stellar movie. I highly recommend it though if you like westerns, because maybe you will take a different message out of the character of Ben Wade.
IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0381849/
3:10 to Yuma is one of the most interesting westerns to come out since Unforgiven. It follows the story of rancher Dan Evans (Christian Bale) as he escorts the notorious outlaw Ben Wade (Russell Crowe) to a prison train, the 3:10 to Yuma. The cast was well-picked and the acting by Crowe and Bale was nearly flawless (and I traditionally do not appreciate their acting). The storyline entranced me from beginning to end. I kept trying to figure out what would happen and kept finding myself unexpectedly surprised. I loved how nearly every character got introduced and eliminated in measured amounts--very fitting of the genre. The character evolution of everyone except Ben Wade was mesmerizing. The landscapes were beautifully shot, the editing perfectly well-paced. And 3:10 to Yuma has an absolutely amazing score.I really disliked the character of Ben Wade. Everyone else was really interesting and fascinating, but Ben Wade was just disappointing. I got really excited as the film progressed, because it seemed as if he was actually getting more and more evil. What most movies that try to humanize bad guys do is show his evil side first and then his human side at the end. This movie started out by flipping that, slowly increasing his brutality as time went on, but in the end it flipped back to his sympathetic side. Didn't really like that. Also, it kind of went crazy at the end and I didn't buy the shift in Wade's character. It felt like he did stuff out of character to fit the plot. How disappointing in an otherwise stellar movie. I highly recommend it though if you like westerns, because maybe you will take a different message out of the character of Ben Wade.
IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0381849/
July 15, 2007
Knocked Up (2006)
4.9/5
Knocked Up is an incredibly hilarious movie about a one-night stand that turns into a pregnancy. From a simple story comes incredibly rich and developed characters and healthy doses of humor and heart. You go to see this movie for the jokes (and I was laughing the entire time), but the staying power rests in the deeper meaning and take-home message about life and love. Unlike other comedies like Hot Fuzz, when this movie tries to make a dramatic point, it feels like part of the movie and not a side note. The flow in this movie as the mood shifts gears is fantastic, aided by excellent music choices. My favorite parts were when people were arguing, because it seemed like that's when the characters were most themselves and the details and subtle mannerisms showed. That was also when I laughed the hardest. The writing in this movie was not exactly brilliant or original, but the stellar acting brought it to life. Being a fan of The Office, I especially loved seeing Darryl from warehouse, Ryan the temp, and Steve Carell make cameos. And Alan Tudyk from Firefly. I especially loved all the references to other movies, not just in dialogue and background sets, but also in plot and shot constructions.
There were some things I didn't like about the movie, although infrequent. First, much of it was simply too graphic. Random boobs were wholly unnecessary. And why they showed a newborn crowning is a mystery to me. A bit out of place in this comedy. Second, many of the side characters and side plots, while very funny, simply took away from the movie instead of adding to it, except in length. Sometimes characters' moods and motivations shifted and changed with little explanation, although it was never too unreasonable. Every so often something you thought was small would turn out to be extremely important and vice versa, which sometimes felt like forcing the plot in a certain direction in an otherwise fluid script. Also, the cinematography and editing were nothing to write home about, not that you would think they might be. All in all, however, a very entertaining movie that's more than just a stupid comedy.
IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0478311/
Knocked Up is an incredibly hilarious movie about a one-night stand that turns into a pregnancy. From a simple story comes incredibly rich and developed characters and healthy doses of humor and heart. You go to see this movie for the jokes (and I was laughing the entire time), but the staying power rests in the deeper meaning and take-home message about life and love. Unlike other comedies like Hot Fuzz, when this movie tries to make a dramatic point, it feels like part of the movie and not a side note. The flow in this movie as the mood shifts gears is fantastic, aided by excellent music choices. My favorite parts were when people were arguing, because it seemed like that's when the characters were most themselves and the details and subtle mannerisms showed. That was also when I laughed the hardest. The writing in this movie was not exactly brilliant or original, but the stellar acting brought it to life. Being a fan of The Office, I especially loved seeing Darryl from warehouse, Ryan the temp, and Steve Carell make cameos. And Alan Tudyk from Firefly. I especially loved all the references to other movies, not just in dialogue and background sets, but also in plot and shot constructions.
There were some things I didn't like about the movie, although infrequent. First, much of it was simply too graphic. Random boobs were wholly unnecessary. And why they showed a newborn crowning is a mystery to me. A bit out of place in this comedy. Second, many of the side characters and side plots, while very funny, simply took away from the movie instead of adding to it, except in length. Sometimes characters' moods and motivations shifted and changed with little explanation, although it was never too unreasonable. Every so often something you thought was small would turn out to be extremely important and vice versa, which sometimes felt like forcing the plot in a certain direction in an otherwise fluid script. Also, the cinematography and editing were nothing to write home about, not that you would think they might be. All in all, however, a very entertaining movie that's more than just a stupid comedy.IMDb link: http://imdb.com/title/tt0478311/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



