August 29, 2009

The Time Traveler's Wife (2009)

3/5

The Time Traveler's Wife is a surprisingly well-shot romance about a man who inexplicably travels through time and the woman he falls in love with and marries. Henry's disappearing act, which the movie is content to call a genetic anomaly and leave it at that, often keeps Claire without a husband for dinner and alone on Christmas and New Year's. The movie is both depressing and uplifting; it is unafraid to examine tragedy and death but knows that in the end it must give us new birth and eternal hope. The leads give heartfelt performances, but the dialogue and script often fall flat. It was hard for me to treat the scenario as realistically and everyday as they did, which often gave the piece a very written feel to it. Yes, I can see how it would be infuriating for Claire, but it's difficult to empathize with her when she lashes out at Henry for something he can't control. (And on a side note, the broken timeline is just too confusing for audiences to fully unravel on an initial viewing.)

Technically, the movie was an unexpected delight. The cinematography was exceptional. Nearly every scene had a fluid tracking shot with elegant compositions and rack focuses. The camerawork was beautiful and evocative, and it was integrated seamlessly with subtle, understated special effects. The "montage" scene before Alba's 5th birthday--where the camera circles the various rooms in their house to show Alba's childhood--is a perfect example. Another is the scene where Henry steps off the train after speaking with his mother for the first time since age 6. The movie has some truly stunning shots. If you like romances, or if you like technically proficient films, then you will no doubt like this movie. But if you don't, it with fail to change any opinions you hold about the romance genre.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0452694/

August 22, 2009

District 9 (2009)

5/5

Neill Blomkamp's District 9 is a rare treasure of cinema. Much like my favorite film of 2006, Children of Men, the director envisions an alternate yet wholly believable future, and then uses his camera to immerse us in the gritty, raw realism of his dystopia. The story is set in Johannesburg, where an alien spacecraft stops and hovers over the city. The military drills into the ship to reveal a population of malnourished prawn-like aliens. Humanitarian organizations demand they be taken care of, and a district is set aside for them to co-exist with humans. Crime and violence precipitates between humans and aliens for over 20 years until it is decided that the aliens should be relocated to a new area. It is here that the movie begins, after setting in place all the essential details that will be brought back, full circle, to the thrilling climax and poignant denouement.

Wikus van de Merwe is the bureaucratic agent responsible for evicting the prawns. One such prawn, Christopher Johnson, and his son are the other main characters of the story. All three are painted with such clarity and precision, and acted with such honesty, that they must be real. Shot with a vivid cinéma vérité style, you truly feel and live in their world. The editing and overall pacing are both brilliant, effortlessly mixing together CGI animation, documentary-like footage, and intense action sequences. The film does a remarkable thing, and it does so with absolute perfection. As I said in the beginning of my review, this film is a rare treasure of cinema and one I will not forget for a very long time. Go and see this movie. Go and see this movie now.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/

August 21, 2009

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

4/5

Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds is a stunning film, but it is by no means Tarantino's best. The story follows several tracks that all converge on one night for the premiere of a German propaganda film called Nation's Pride (fake trailer here). The first track is that of a group of merciless Jewish Nazi-killers known as The Basterds, led by Lt. Aldo Raine (Pitt). The second and third tracks concern a young Jewish girl named Shosanna (Laurent), who just barely escapes with her life after SS Col. Hans Landa (Waltz) kills her entire family. There are a few more tracks involving actors and actresses and translators and Hitler as the movie closes in on its explosive finale, but I'll leave that to you to experience when you watch it.

One thing that really irked me was that the intro credits, the musical style, and even the chapter narrative structure are all straight-up stolen from, or at least strongly reminiscent of, Tarantino's last stand-alone project, Kill Bill. The problem is that those aspects weren't even the best part about Kill Bill, which leads me to believe he's running out of creativity. For example, the Samuel L. Jackson narration, which probably seems cool on paper, ultimately feels empty on screen (mostly because he has nothing important to say). Also, while better than most movies, the dialogue in Inglourious Basterds isn't as luscious as I know he's capable of, and I feel the replay value will probably suffer as a result. Despite these disappointments, Tarantino is effective at building tension from simple situations and maintaining it over a 2.5 hour movie through stellar cinematography, lighting, and editing, which are all up to his usual exquisite form. I definitely recommend this movie to Tarantino fans, just understand that there's nothing revolutionary about it. In fact, it sits rather low on my ranking of Tarantino films. But it's still a quality film that's worth watching.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361748/

Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li (2009)

2/5

Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li is a surprising movie for a number of reasons. It's not surprising because it was bad--I expected that. It's surprising because it was much better than I thought it would be in a lot of its aspects. The cinematography, costumes, and action all impressed me more often than not. Yes, I will admit that some of the action was bad, and in fact I've seen much better action before, but it was far from the worst I've seen. The must frustrating part about this movie is that it adds random characters to the Street Fighter universe and completely ignores some of the more famous and memorable ones. Oh, I almost forgot about the plot. But that's okay. There's no need to really tell you what the plot is about because, unlike on AMC, the story doesn't matter here. And of course there's bad acting, bad writing, simplistic back stories, and superfluous side plots, but they're to be expected. As long as you go into this movie knowing just how bad it's going to be and in what ways, then by all means enjoy it at your own risk.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0891592/

August 20, 2009

Big Touble in Little China (1986)

2/5

John Carpenter's Big Trouble in Little China is a popcorn flick with non-stop action and cheesy acting. The plot follows truck driver Jack Burton (Russell) and Chinese gambler Wang (Dun). Burton falls in love with lawyer Gracie Law (Cattrall) and Wang is set to marry Miao Yin (Pai). When Miao Yin gets kidnapped by a gang and brought to Lo Pan (Hong), an ancient spirit who wants to marry her in order to become flesh and blood again, the other three set off to rescue her.

The story is unnecessarily convoluted and bites off more than it can chew. With every explanation of some supernatural event comes more questions and loose ends. In fact, it's not even worth listening to their explanations, because it doesn't affect the movie in any way, shape, or form. The problem is that it spends over 30 minutes trying and trying and trying to explain everything, which ends up being 30 minutes of wasted time. Even if they weren't wasted on dialogue, however, those 30 minutes would be wasted on the same ludicrous action, horrendous special effects, and hollow acting that fill up the other 60 minutes. The way Kurt Russell speaks reminds me of Private Joker's fake John Wayne parody in Full Metal Jacket. Pretty much nothing about this movie is good. But at least it's fast-paced crap. It isn't mind-numbingly boring or too terribly offensive to my senses. Still, avoid it if you can.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090728/

Ponyo (2008)

4/5

Hayao Miyazaki's Ponyo is a wonderfully inventive, creative foray into another universe. The story follows a young boy named Sosuke (Jonas) and a magical goldfish creature (Cyrus) that he saves and names Ponyo. Sosuke lives with his mother (Fey) in a seaside village, alone on a cliff, while his father (Damon) is out at sea. Ponyo's father (Neeson) wants to get his daughter back because the future of the world depends on it. And so begins their magical story together.

The best part about Miyazaki's directing is by far the fantastic world he creates, the characters that inhabit it, and the rules they live by. It is fully-realized and awe-inspiring, and it is something I have never seen before. Much like Tim Burton's works, the movie has the potential to frighten and terrify, but instead benevolently lets us enjoy the triumphs over the catastrophes. However, the directing and the movie as a whole suffer from a few problems as well. There is no real conflict to consider except perhaps that nobody really knows what's going on, so they might "make a mistake" and cause the world to be destroyed. In fact, the audience doesn't know what's going on at all either because the background story isn't fleshed-out enough for anybody's to comprehend it. Side stories seem to be picked up and ignored almost haphazardly. And Fey's voice acting was sometimes good, sometimes downright bad--I'm sorry to report--but mostly just distracting. Overall, however, these flaws aren't that bad. If you're a Miyazaki fan, this will definitely not disappoint.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0876563/

August 13, 2009

Hiroshima Mon Amour (1959)

4/5

Alain Resnais's Hiroshima Mon Amour is a powerful, quasi-experimental meditation on eternal love, the memory of love, and the gradual disintegration of memory. The plot follows a torrid affair between two separately married people, a Japanese architect and a French actress, over a few days in Hiroshima. She reveals to him her past in Nevers, where she fell in love with a German soldier who was killed, and her fear that she would eventually forget the true depths of the love they shared. As most of the movie is spent dealing with the ephemeral nature of memory, often through repetition of words and scenes that are almost hypnotizing, one can see its similarities to his later film Last Year at Marienbad. However, Last Year at Marienbad was far more experimental with filmmaking techniques and simply did not have the same grounding in reality that this one did. In Hiroshima Mon Amour, we get at least a sense of what really happened and can appreciate how our memory may warp that past event.

Much like Night and Fog, his earlier documentary on the Holocaust, Resnais shows us some unforgettable images of the nuclear aftermath. For the first thirty minutes of the film, we are entranced, engrossed, and disgusted by the still photos, archival footage, and simple verbal depictions of the horrors of that event. To describe the bombing of Hiroshima by saying that the entire city was lifted off the ground and drifted back down to earth as ashes is such absolutely perfect writing. And yet that beautiful, haunting line is just one of many lines that are equally insightful and piercing. With regards to cinematography and editing, the film is both proficient and experimental. When the experiment works, it works exquisitely well. And when it fails, it fails miserably. For me, most of it worked, but I can see it turning a lot of people off from the movie. If you're not in the mood to experience all the piece has to offer, the film can appear slow and plodding. It can be frustrating at times, thinking of the movie in a traditional narrative structure and trying to figure out what "actually" happened. But if you let go of that need, step outside of your comfort zone, you may find this movie to be a spectacular gem. I highly recommend you give it a shot.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052893/

Funny People (2009)

3/5

Despite the rating of 3 stars, Judd Apatow's Funny People is not a mediocre movie. It's actually a great movie that suffers from some serious flaws. The plot follows star comedian George Simmons (Sandler) after he is diagnosed with AML. While depressed, he hires young stand-up comic Ira Wright (Rogen) to be his assistant and help write jokes for him. He finally starts accepting his impending death and, because of it, begins rekindling old relationships, including the love of his life, Laura (Mann). He miraculously recovers and, with his new lease on life, decides to pursue Laura and what he hopes is the key to his happiness.

Some of the scenes in this movie are incredibly powerful and moving (for example, when he first finds out about the disease, or when he fears that the drugs are making him sicker, or when he starts opening up to people, or the complicated mess they get into at the end). Some of the scenes, mostly the stand-up routines, are ridiculously hilarious. And I especially loved all the scenes where real-life comedians (Norm MacDonald, Dave Attell, Sarah Silverman, Ray Romano) play themselves. But some scenes just muddle the message and some scenes that need to be there just aren't. It's frustrating in a movie that seems so close to greatness fall so short. And it's unsatisfying. Even after 2 hours and 15 minutes, when I realized the credits were about to roll on the final shot, I thought to myself, "That's it? There's nothing more he has to say?"

The humor is actually fairly dissonant; you get the Adam Sandler humor of old mixed with the Seth Rogen/Judd Apatow humor of new and they just don't go together. I often had to force myself to laugh at most of Sandler's comedic lines. I never really found him that funny to start with, and this movie didn't change my opinion. On the bright side, the acting was effective and empathetic, from all parties, and most directorial decisions were spot-on. The cinematography was surprisingly effective at setting mood and evoking emotion with simple point-of-view shots. The editing was good for the most part, although it lagged in some parts as well. All in all, the movie was technically proficient with some very emotional scenes that ultimately leave you unfulfilled and aggravated. If you like Judd Apatow movies, you'll probably like this one, but it's definitely not as good as his other two.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1201167/

August 10, 2009

Amarcord (1973)

4/5

Federico Fellini's Amarcord is a vivacious tale of a year in the life of a young man on the cusp of manhood. It is also about Borgo, the seaside town he resides in (based on the real-life Rimini where Fellini grew up), and all of its bizarre, quirky inhabitants. But there is not much of a traditional narrative structure. Amarcord is more a series of vibrant images, the kind that resides in your childhood memory, with little to link them together. This seems to be what Fellini specializes in: aesthetically unique visuals strung together more by proximity rather than plot. Even without something to glue the vignettes together, there is still a surprising thematic unity. The overarching seasonal changes also help to tie the stories together and brings the finale back to the start.

Technically, Fellini is as good as he ever was. The cinematography is beautiful, the editing is tight, and the acting is spot-on. And it is a pleasure to watch, with some surprising scenes (the tobacconist) and some poignant ones (the eccentric uncle). The movie reminded me a lot of Cinema Paradiso, one of my all-time favorite films, but simply doesn't reach the same power or meaning for me. I know they were made with different intents and it is perhaps unreasonable to compare the two, but Cinema Paradiso is definitely more my kind of movie. Still, Amarcord is an impressive film for many reasons and definitely goes highly recommended by me.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071129/

August 09, 2009

Kagemusha (1980)

4/5

Akira Kurosawa's Kagemusha, which translates to Shadow Warrior, is a historical epic during the 1500's that focuses on Lord Shingen (Nakadai) as he combats Lords Ieyasu (Yui) and Nobunaga (Ryu) to unite and rule Japan. Shingen's brother Nobukado (Yamazaki) rescues a thief from crucifixion due to his resemblance to Shingen and his potential to be used as a kagemusha, or double. During a battle, Shingen is shot and killed; his dying wish is for his death to be kept a secret for three years. And so the thief begins to impersonate Lord Shingen, but deceiving his grandson, mistresses, and untameable horse is not a simple task.

The movie is technically impressive. The seven-minute single-take intro shot transfixes you. The use of colors is brilliant, beautiful, and awe-inspiring. There is one shot in the movie that rivals the best single shot I have ever seen in any movie--and it's immediately followed by another ridiculous shot. The acting and dialogue are all phenomenal as well. However, the editing drags a bit. The film should have been at least 15-30 minutes shorter. There is almost 10 minutes of pointless repetition in the penultimate scene of the movie. And there is not much closure at the end. This may be because the film is a historical epic (and a rather accurate one, from what I can gather) and not a samurai movie, as I had first thought. It's important to realize that, because there are very different expectations in characterization, atmosphere, and plot progression between the two. Be sure you know what you're getting into when you start this movie, or you may be disappointed. Still, I highly recommend you see it.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080979/

August 07, 2009

Vertigo (1958)

5/5

Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo is a tantalizing masterpiece. The answers to its mysteries ebb and flow beyond your grasp, always so close but always out of reach. It opens itself up to various interpretations, letting you come to your own conclusions without ever affirming or rejecting them. The movie tackles a great many intertwining topics: for me, the most potent one is the need for people to control their own lives, sometimes by controlling others' lives as well. It contorts itself into a tale of obsessive love, of purity and perversion, and of deception and dual identities. It is dark, often morbid, and unsettling, but it is the kind of work you will never forget.

The movie starts in the middle of a cop chase. Leaping from rooftop to rooftop, Scottie Ferguson (Stewart) slips and barely catches a gutter. Perilously hanging on for dear life, he looks down more than five stories and a crippling vertigo paralyzes him. Another policeman reaches down to help, only to fall to his own doom. Scottie's fear of heights is cemented through this traumatic event and he quits the police force. Soon after, he is contacted by an old college buddy who requests his assistance in tailing his wife. He suspects her of being possessed by a ghost and is afraid that the spirit inhabiting his wife, who committed suicide at age 26, will cause her to do the same thing. As he begins following her, Scottie develops an attraction for her that soon turns into an unhealthy fixation. But that is only half the story. After that, it spirals more and more out of control, beyond anything you could have predicted.

Watching Vertigo again, and thinking about it next to Notorious and Psycho, I am struck by Hitchcock's mastery of structure. He seems attracted to scripts with unconventional story arcs and plot progression. Most directors would struggle against invoking boredom with such an uncertain framework. Hitchcock uses it to his advantage to generate suspense, manipulate your expectations, and telegraph events to their breaking points. You have never seen a story told this way, and so you have no idea what might come next. In a horror movie like Psycho, that's the most terrifying fear you can imagine. In Vertigo, that's the strongest, most mesmerizing pull you will ever experience.

The casting of Jimmy Stewart, originally maligned by critics and by Hitchcock himself, turns out to be one of the film's greatest strengths. Stewart is America's hero, the original Tom Hanks, the everyman, the good guy; he is Mr. Smith at Washington and George Bailey with his wonderful life. And here he is deeply disturbed, twisted so far from his off-screen celebrity persona that you feel a torment brewing inside yourself. You want to care for him, you want to believe he is the sweet, kind-hearted soul you know and love, but witnessing his repugnant actions sickens you. No other actor could have pulled off that necessary duality.

The cinematography is, as always, remarkable. The signature track in, zoom out shot reminds us of his technical abilities, but there are many more scenes where his sense of atmosphere defines how he shoots. In the scene at Ernie's where Scottie first sees Madeleine (Novak), the camera moves as if in a dream. The room brightens when she passes by and dims after she leaves. Her platinum hair, pinned up into a spiral, and all-gray suit give her an eerie aura. Hitchcock's use of colors is entrancing; they are inserted into scenes with such presence and purpose that it makes you wonder what they mean. Because it has to mean something, right?

The movie has some flaws. The special effects, both in the opening credits and nightmare sequence, severely date the film. Several key plot points remain unexplained and some of the dialogue rings a little off to our modern ears. (Are people really diagnosed with "acute melancholia, coupled with a guilt complex"?) And for some reason, which may be entirely circumstantial and outside the realm of the film, the movie wasn't as gripping on this viewing as it has been in the past. Still, this is one of Hitchcock's finest movies. I'll now admit that Psycho is my favorite Hitchcock, but I would not have any cause to disagree with someone who placed Vertigo or Notorious in that spot. Vertigo is a masterpiece that would define the entire work of any other director and is essential viewing for anyone interested in cinema as an art form.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052357/

August 06, 2009

(500) Days of Summer (2009)

4.9/5

Marc Webb's (500) Days of Summer has an infuriating title. It's annoying typing all those parentheses while organizing an outing to see the movie; or while adding, deleting, and re-adding it to Google Calendar when plans change; or while talking about how good it is with friends. And I would bet money on the fact that the parentheses don't even mean anything. They're just flourishes to make the movie seem indie-cool. Luckily, that's the worst part about the movie. Everything else is perfect.

Starring two of the leading indie actors working today (Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel), you can tell this is going to be an indie film. And it is. From the hipster outfits to the eclectic soundtrack, from the quirky habits to the unique sensibilities, this is indie to a T. But not the original independent of the 70's, the now-mainstream, now-conventional independent of contemporary cinema. Being what it is, it's not always original. In fact, most of the filmmaking techniques are repackagings of those found in Annie Hall (which is incidentally my favorite romantic comedy of all time). But what it copies, it copies well. It is polished and pristine. And most importantly, it works. I've seen characters break into song and dance before, I've seen unorthodox or broken timelines before, and I've seen brilliant use of split-screen before, but it all comes together here to create a compelling, fulfilling, emotional whole.

The story is a typical boy-meets-girl tale, but the narrator warns us that it is not a love story. And he's right. To a romantic, every girl you fall for is the love of your life. And since the movie is told from the guy's point of view, it seems like she really is "the one." And in that tender moment where he finally realizes that she isn't right for him, where he accurately pinpoints her role in his life, the movie peaks. You get that warm, fuzzy feeling in the film's bittersweet finale that every romance aspires to. You cherish the film, realizing that all the special effect gimmicks, all the "experimental" styles, all the editing, the cinematography, the acting, the writing--all that was there for the sole purpose of sending your heart aflutter. And like I said, it works. If you liked Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind or Garden State, don't hesitate to watch this movie. You will fall in love with it.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1022603/

Bed and Board (1970)

4/5

François Truffaut's Bed and Board is a playful and touching exploration of the life of a young married couple, Antoine (Leaud) and Christine (Jade), and their continual learning and maturing process. It examines the joys of a new child, the trials of adulterous desires, and the aches of separation. It is a simple yet well-made film that is filled with vivacity and infused with love for its inhabitants.

The editing is efficient, almost too efficient, never letting us take a breather from the whirlwind that is this couple's new life. The acting is capable, but the script often feels a bit written or staged. And some audiovisual quirks and idiosyncrasies stand out as bizarre or strange to people unfamiliar with Truffaut. This is in part due to Truffaut's history with New Wave, although here it is more refined and less experimental than in his earlier works. Truffaut does not always make good movies--and he has in fact made some terrible movies--but his Antoine Doinel ones are fantastic. And trust me when I say that this is one that I fully enjoyed from beginning to end and highly recommend.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065651/

August 05, 2009

Los Olvidados (1950)

4/5

Luis Buñuel's Los Olvidados, which translates to The Forgotten, tells the story of a young boy named Pedro who is caught up in a life of crime in the festering slums of Mexico City. He is friends with a gang of ragamuffins, including the recently escaped Jaibo, but wants to go straight. He tries returning to his mother for help, but she doesn't believe he has good intentions. Still, he presses on, finding legitimate work at a blacksmith, and then at a carnival. But at every opportunity for success, Jaibo is there to pull the carpet out from under his legs and flip his life upside-down again.

You feel for Pedro, you root him on, and you feel the pain he feels every time he bumps into Jaibo and things turn from bad to worse. It is gripping and depressing; it is not, as the intro tells us, optimistic. In fact, the intro tells us that there is no hope for the characters because there must be social change to cure the ills depicted in the film. But it failed to convince me of that premise because every obstacle Pedro encounters originates not from society as a whole, but from Jaibo as an individual.

The film is fairly mediocre on technical terms. The shots were conventional, the editing was shoddy, and the sound seemed perpetually off. Everything felt somewhat staged. The strength is in the film's quasi-surrealist images and ideas: a boy throwing an egg at a chicken to make it go away, a boy sucking milk straight from the udder of a donkey, a group of boys tossing mud and stones at a blind man. They are images that are difficult to ignore or forget. But they are images that hold power, value, and meaning. And they are images you should see.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042804/

August 04, 2009

La Dolce Vita (1960)

4/5

Federico Fellini's La Dolce Vita, The Sweet Life in English, tells the story of journalist Marcello (Mastroianni) and the wild, extravagant bacchanalias he shares with international actresses and other wealthy women. The movie is adept at showing the striking disconnect between how the celebrities appear and how they truly are. Through Marcello's eyes, we see the excessive, endless parties lasting well past sunrise that inevitably result in his unconsummated lust. We see their paparazzi-bloated image twist his mind into thinking he's experienced unrequited love; only on the following day do we see what kind of lives they actually lead. We realize we really have no idea who these people are, and neither did Marcello, which only causes him to drown his sorrows in more drinking. In part a condemnation of sensationalist media (Fellini actually coined the term paparazzi in this movie), in part an exposé on the lifestyles of the rich and the famous, this film is astute and meaningful, absorbing and immersing, and above all aesthetically mesmerizing.

La Dolce Vita is visually intoxicating from start to end. Something about the cinematography, the movement of the camera, the movement of the characters, makes the whole film seem so alive. The film itself dances to Nino Rota's score. That is not to say that the 2 hour, 45 minute film is without flaw. It takes a while to make its message known; it seems to espouse the vapid lifestyles at first and only at the end are we meant to realize their inadequacies. It has its fair share of boring parts. In fact, the parties themselves turn boring quite quickly--an intended effect, I presume--and the parties form the bulk of the film. Also, it was sometimes confusing trying to orient yourselves to time, place, and person because of the repetitive nights Marcello spends wandering the streets of Rome. Still, La Dolce Vita is well worth watching and well worth remembering.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053779/

Monsoon Wedding (2001)

4/5

Mira Nair's Monsoon Wedding is a touching movie about the somewhat rushed marriage of an Indian family's only daughter and the numerous other intricately connected subplots on the days leading up to the wedding ceremony. New love blossoms as old secrets are revealed. The story is poignant, the filmmaking is active, and the costume and set design are colorful and vibrant. The acting feels natural and real, and I especially liked the integration of English and Hindi. Nair paints a very convincing portrait of modern Indian culture, right down to the earthy hues, and she does it in a way that doesn't alienate people like me who aren't fans of Bollywood cinema.

Nair's later film The Namesake is not nearly as good, in my eyes. It sprawls too much. Monsoon Wedding is contained to a few days, which helps for the narrative's structure and the audience's expectations of where they are in the movie and when it's going to end. All in all, this movie is an excellent example of non-Bollywood Indian cinema and is a fun--but not shallow--movie on the ties that bind us together, whether through love, family, or culture. Highly recommended.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0265343/

August 03, 2009

Dersu Uzala (1975)

2/5

Akira Kurosawa's Dersu Uzala follows the friendship between Russian explorer Arseniev (Solomin) and Goldi hunter Dersu Uzala (Munzuk). There is no real story to speak of--it is instead a series of short adventures the two share while exploring--and there is no real end in sight, which makes the 2.5 hour runtime feel that much more painful and soporific. His use of long takes felt like wasted time in the already long and boring movie. He would have had to cut a lot more than an hour off to make this movie interesting and compelling enough for me to recommend.

The characters feel simple, superficial, and contrived. The acting isn't that great and is thankfully left mostly in the background. The cinematography was surprisingly underwhelming. Maybe I just expect too much of Kurosawa's camera, but this does not look like a Kurosawa picture. Not by a long shot. His black and white films reveal his acute eye, but in this movie I see only bland, washed-out colors reminiscent of generic 70's films. If I could go back in time and meet up with Kurosawa, I would have suggested he avoid Russian writing, because this film and The Idiot are by far his worst ones. I find little to value in this picture, and cannot imagine many people will either.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071411/

The King of Kong (2007)

4/5

The King of Kong is an utterly engrossing, utterly captivating documentary on the world of competitive classic gaming. It follows newcomer Steve Wiebe in his attempt to beat the classic Donkey Kong champion Billy Mitchell. The players are absolutely fascinating; they are humanly complex with richness and depth that resonate with honesty. They don't fully reveal themselves to the camera and so you get the sense that they have lives outside of the movie, which is the ultimate goal of any film. Character studies are always vastly more interesting in documentaries than any traditional narrative could be, and The King of Kong is a prime example.

The structure of the film is brilliant. It sets up the story perfectly, from the greatness of the champion to the genius of the challenger. The editing is effective and efficient. It builds up the tension and excitement far better than most action blockbusters or mystery thrillers have been capable of. Watching it on Netflix Play Now, the film occasionally stopped due to poor buffering, and I just yelled at the screen, giddy to know what happened next. I can't imagine doing that for any other documentary. This movie is a true piece of entertainment, and despite the low-quality camerawork and simple special effects, I highly highly recommend it.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0923752/

August 02, 2009

Winter Light (1962)

4/5

Ingmar Bergman's Winter Light follows a pastor who begins to lose his faith in God after his wife dies. Much like Through a Glass Darkly, it examines religious doubt and God's silence during trying times. Except here we have a much more coherent message and powerful story that leaves you in breathless anticipation for its entire second half. What makes this movie so good is that the pastor's ultimate decision on whether to maintain his faith is entirely left up to the viewer. It can be interpreted either way, depending on the viewer's own beliefs. This is a difficult feat that Bergman has accomplished, and would be considered magical if the whole movie weren't so depressing. But depressing is what it is, which may turn some people away from this thought-provoking film.

As I said before, this movie shares a lot with Bergman's earlier film. The dialogue is rich with depth and thematic meaning; he even reuses several quotes and images from his previous film to much greater effect. The cinematography is even crisper and more beautiful than before and the editing is vastly improved. The use of sound and silence is intelligently conceived and effectively carried out. The acting is underplayed the right amount and the characters and their relationships are complex without being incomprehensible. However, it may not appeal to people with little interest in religion or faith. And it can be a bit boring at times (although it is also relatively short, at 80 minutes). Regardless, this is a fascinating study of man's faith during times of apparent abandonment, and can be a potent discussion-starter if you ever find yourself in the mood to think about such topics.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057358/

Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)

2/5

Creature from the Black Lagoon is about a group of marine scientists in the Amazon who find a fossilized claw and try to dig out the rest of the prehistoric amphibious humanoid creature. During their expedition, they discover that the species did not die out 15 million years ago as they suspected; there is a lone survivor in the lagoon that starts to harass and kill them. It is unclear if the monster is trying to protect his habitat against the intruders, or if it is simply a violent, horny fish-man that enjoys killing men and capturing women. Many people love these classic Universal monster movies, extolling their ability to go against expectations by showing that the monster is capable of love and beauty. Unfortunately, this message was perfected 20 years prior in King Kong and is frankly not that novel or profound anymore.

The acting was expectedly hammy, with equally bland characters to match. The men are manly and fight over the woman, whose only job is to scream when she turns around at the last second and sees the creature approach. The creature is actually pretty spooky, shot in a way that emphasizes the good costuming and makeup. The underwater shots are surprisingly impressive as well. They are as impressive as the above-water shots are unimpressive, which is to say: very. The blaring trumpet that serves as the creature's musical theme/motif, on the other hand, was just repetitive and annoying. Don't bother with this film unless you already know you're the kind who will like it.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046876/

August 01, 2009

Red Beard (1965)

4/5

Red Beard would be a laudable movie by any other director, but is somewhat disappointing coming from Kurosawa. It follows a small town doctor nicknamed Red Beard (Mifune) and his arrogant new intern Dr. Yasumoto (Kayama), who would rather serve as the shogun's personal doctor instead of working in the free clinic. Through the few months of his training, he witnesses several life-altering and humbling stories that convince him to stay. Much like MASH, the film feels extremely episodic and there is neither a typical story arc nor a predictable end point. Each individual vignette is quite satisfying, exposing the human motivation behind seemingly malevolent or cruel actions, but they don't really cohere into a satisfying whole. I can easily see this being turned into a sappy melodramatic TV series by money-hungry producers.

The technical aspects of this film are of the highest caliber. Kurosawa's camera is impeccable. It moves naturally and smoothly through long takes to effortlessly compose scenes of stunning beauty and power. The editing, for the most part, is practically invisible. In combination with his camerawork, you never feel like you're watching a movie--you're simply watching events happen before your eyes. But there were also a few times where the editing was striking, jarring, and altogether confusing; luckily they were few and far between. His use of music is exciting and appropriate without going overboard, although it did approach that fine line several times. The acting by all parties is pitch-perfect and worthy of praise. Not a single player disappoints. I am always impressed by Mifune, and here he lives up to my high expectations. All in all, this is a terrific film on technical grounds with inspiring short stories. But the stories, when taken together, are below par for Kurosawa. This is worth watching, but know that it isn't among Kurosawa's best.

IMDb link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058888/